In this country, fear has become a defining narrative, even among evangelicals. It comes in many forms: fear of unemployment, fear of the unknown, fear of the infringement of rights—all these things are concerning. But one in particular—fear of terrorism—has caused a unique problem when it comes to community and love of neighbor.
This fear has played a significant role in how we view “the other.” Our fear of terrorism, and often of Muslims in general, has been perpetuated and exacerbated by the recent election. This includes the narrative of President-elect Donald Trump’s campaign, and even now, his appointment of several people to key positions of leadership who share those sentiments.
A year ago, World Relief launched its “We Welcome Refugees” campaign. A year ago, the Billy Graham Center hosted the GC2 Refugee Leadership Meeting and Summit. A year ago, caring for refugees was a key value for many evangelicals.
And yet, less than 365 days later, 81 percent of white evangelicals voted for a candidate whose campaign advocated for the rejection of refugees in favor of safety and consistency. And many people responded by listening to their fears.
But, at the core of who we are as followers of Christ, is a commitment to care for the vulnerable, the marginalized, the abused and the displaced. It’s Advent, and we look back to the time thousands of years ago when a husband and wife couldn’t find a welcome home to stay. Today, millions of people are in a similar position, having had to flee home, safety, family and livelihood due to violence or poverty.
What is an evangelical to do? We are to hold to the critical pro-life issues that we have always held to. And we must remind ourselves that being pro-life is about all of life—from conception onward, from start to finish and all the moments in between. We cannot say that we are pro-life if we turn our backs on those in need. And so we must circle back to the refugee crisis.
I currently serve as interim pastor at Moody Church in Chicago, the oldest Protestant megachurch in the world. It’s a church committed to missions, and specifically to working with refugees who are resettling in the Chicago area. Many churches still hold to this value of caring for the marginalized and needy.
And yet, we have seen many Americans, including some evangelicals, who have perhaps chosen themselves over “the other.” They have allowed themselves to be swayed by the rhetoric that boasted the benefits of being anti-immigrant and anti-refugee. It seems that Americans are a welcoming and generous people, except when they’re afraid. Let me reiterate: Fear has become a defining narrative, and it has caused many to question whether they should be open to refugees and immigrants.
So where do we go from here? How do evangelicals who are committed to helping refugees interact with those who view the issue differently? Let me suggest three ways to prepare ourselves for the refugee discussion in the days to come.
1. We need to recognize that we are on the other side of the governmental process.
No, we shouldn’t stop advocating for refugees and speaking prophetically into the governmental process. However, we must recognize that we’re on the other side of that process. Romans 13 is between us and refugees.
The government will vote and decide who is received as a refugee. And we must advocate and pray for issues of justice and people who are being marginalized. But we must also acknowledge where we currently sit and move forward with eyes wide open. We don’t, and can’t, align with a government that doesn’t side with the vulnerable and seek ways to care for them. That is Christ’s mandate to his followers: to care for the widow and orphan.
2. We need to be prepared to tell our people that we care for refugees.
We need to study the refugee process and be informed participants in the discussion. This is important, because our words matter and can help people think differently. Ignorance fuels the acceptance of inaccurate information and false news. As leaders, we must encourage our people to learn about the refugee process and reflect on what Scripture calls us to live out. We will then be able to have conversations that can lead to changed thinking.
For example, if someone says, “We’re letting in people who are dangerous and want to harm us,” we can respond, “Let me ask you a question. If you wanted to sneak into a country to harm people, would you go through an 18-month to two-year process, have your fingerprints and biometrics taken, have your background looked into, and then show up? Or would you find a much easier means to sneak into a country?” The reality is that there are easier ways to get into our country. It is only by being informed of how processes work that we can be good advocates for people in need.
3. We must remember that God’s Word can combat fear.
Fear motivates people to say, do and advocate for things that they otherwise wouldn’t be. Of course, this does not always mean that a presidential election vote means a specific fear. I know people who voted for President-elect Trump for different reasons than his view on refugees, and think very differently than he does on this issue. That said, we cannot ignore the obvious trend in rhetoric and understanding. We can see there are many who have been captured by a fear of terrorism and “the other” they don’t know and read about on the news.
So what do we do? We speak words of life into their hearts. We speak words of peace, hope and promise. We encourage them to move past the emotions and into acting as people who believe that God holds all things in the palms of his hands. As long as fear reigns anywhere in the world, we have the opportunity to offer a rebuttal—the peace of God that passes all understanding.
Ed Stetzer holds the Billy Graham distinguished chair of church, mission and evangelism at Wheaton College and the Wheaton Grad School, where he also oversees the Billy Graham Center for Evangelism.